Deblurring software on the way (ETA unknown, not real soon)

I am not very geeky, in fact I tend to panic under the technological avalanche. What I am interested in learning about this "de-blurring" technology, however, is whether it would be able to improve the quality of videos such as the Behrens Salome (Madrid 1986) or the Farley Salome (Caracas 1980). I suspect that the answer to my question is "No," for the same reason that it is impossible to obtain an in-focus print from an out-of-focus negative in film photography.

I don't see how this could work when the blur actually is in the original print. All this software probably does is replace the blurred sequences by unblurred pixels in the vicinity. It probably can't add detail to something that's masked.

I may be wrong, but going by the usual standards, you can only work with what's in the original print. So if the print is blurred and lacks the necessary pixels in certain regions, the software usually can't do anything about it, since the blur doesn't give up the underlying pixel informations.

More on topic here:
https://www.raymond.cc/blog/how-to-correct...f-focus-photos/

This is already reality now, and app exist:
https://findface.pro/retargeting.html
More:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FindFace
and more:
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/201...ymity-vkontakte

Attached Image: findface

is it really NoS if the performer was actually naked but the image you're staring it is heavily enhanced by general information about what the obscured parts look like?
No i don`t think it is. More like total overkill