Forum Rules

Lets talk about images...specifically the so called 'selfie'.
All photograph copyright remains with the photographer and not the model or persons in the photograph. So that means the 'selfie' copyright is owned be the person in the picture! I would hazard a guess that 99% of all nude selfies posted on the internet are stolen/leaked images, and should not be posted on this board!

If you are not sure, conduct a reverse image search via Google to see if the owner has relinquished their copyright of the image before posting here.

I may have discovered a slight flaw in the new rule. The search facility does not locate titles and links on the board when text or url addresses are used inside the 'code' section?

For example; flowerspower posted a new find in the vimeo thread today named ‘The cuckoo’ http://vimeo.com/96084485.
Having completed a search, I find only one reference to the link, which (incidentally) was a post I made 5 months ago using the old methods of posting links. (But that is by the by... I am not getting at flowerspower for his post.) What I'm saying is that there should be two references.

What I suggest is that we don't use the 'code' facility to input urls, but simply put a space between the two forward slashes and the beginning of the address.
Thus using :// vimeo.com/96084485 would not show as a direct link but will be found on a search, eliminating duplicate posts.

I agree...It doesn't matter what part we remove so long as its not a hyperlink. But please, also give it the title.

Edited by sonofjoe - 10/11/2014, 22:08

Do the owners of the videos posted on Vimeo really make them private because they get a lot of hits from the members of this forum?

In the year of 2012 Vimeo boasted of 14 million members and with 650 million hits.

There are within Vimeo, countless groups dedicated to linking nude performances of which, have many followers – just a quick glance on 3 groups I usualy visit, have a combined total of 10,000 followers, who each get sent a link to a new video added to their groups page.. The followers then add them as a ‘like’ to their page, who in turn also have followers who add them to their page, ad infinitum.
Then there are also other forums similar to ours, dedicated to the naked form performing on the stage who also link to Vimeo.

So I ask, is it really necessary that we only post text links?
I say yes to new videos that are no older than 1 week. Videos, older than 1 week, with more than 10 ‘likes’ should have a hyperlink. Why? Apart from it probably having been viewed and ‘liked’ many times by Vimeo members and that the owner is aware of this and doesn’t make it private. But, I have noticed a couple of videos have been posted twice. This is maybe because people are not using the search engine to ascertain whether it has already been posted or, that the fact is the search engine does not pick up text urls – try searching for the last 5 videos posted on the Vimeo thread.

I have also noticed that people are not adding the videos title, just the text url! This also creates a problem when searching. Adding a title would not only help the search engine but, should it go private, it would then be searchable via other means with the possibility of finding it posted on another web site other than Vimeo.

Yes, but not simply because of the members here clicking thru. After it is identified here several things happen on Vimeo:

1)It gets added to NoS and other "nude"
2) lots of people like the video
3) Luca Priori posts a comment about adding it to his Art of nakedness or whatever channel
4) The number of views spike

Some of the full videos are left public by accident - perhaps they let it upload overnight. These will be made private soon.
Other times it is the adding to naked channels, comments or views that "freak" the performer

Perhaps it would be good idea to only share full performances in the elite section at the start. Then post in the public area after two weeks?